What Responsible Persons Are Learning Since the 6 April 2026 Commencement Date
It has now been over four months since the Fire Safety (Residential Evacuation Plans) (England) Regulations 2025 came into force on 6 April 2026. There was no grace period and no soft launch — Fire and Rescue Authorities have had enforcement powers from day one. With that much runway behind us, a clearer picture is emerging of where Responsible Persons are finding compliance straightforward, and where the practical reality is proving harder than the guidance suggested.
This page draws together what fire safety professionals, property managers, and government guidance have reported since commencement. For the underlying legal requirements themselves, see our full Residential PEEPs compliance guide and the PEEPs Legal Framework page.
Updated Government Guidance Since Commencement
In December 2025, ahead of the Regulations taking effect, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government published updated guidance and a supporting toolkit for Responsible Persons. Two points from that update are worth Responsible Persons revisiting now that the Regulations are live:
Engagement Is Expected to Be Ongoing, Not a One-Off
The guidance is explicit that identifying residents who may need help evacuating cannot be treated as a single exercise completed at commencement. Responsible Persons are expected to engage with residents at move-in, through an annual reminder to all residents, and whenever a resident requests support directly. Buildings that ran a single identification exercise in early 2026 and have not repeated it since are likely to fall short of what Fire and Rescue Authorities will expect to see evidenced at inspection.
The “Trusted Person” Role
The updated guidance also introduced the concept of a “Trusted Person” — someone a resident nominates to act on their behalf in the PEEP process, distinct from the resident’s own representative arrangements. Responsible Persons who built their consent and engagement processes around earlier draft guidance should check their documentation reflects this addition, as it affects who can validly participate in a resident’s PCFRA and PEEP on their behalf.
Common Challenges Reported Since April
Several recurring themes have come up consistently across fire safety consultancies and property management commentary since commencement:
Residents Declining to Engage
Participation in the Residential PEEPs process is voluntary, and a meaningful number of Responsible Persons have reported residents choosing not to disclose needs or not to participate at all. This is permitted under the Regulations — residents cannot be compelled — but it leaves Responsible Persons needing to demonstrate they made reasonable endeavours to identify relevant residents, even where the outcome was no disclosure. Clear, non-repetitive documentation of engagement attempts has become one of the most commonly cited practical necessities.
The Administrative and Record-Keeping Burden
Buildings implementing PEEPs for the first time have generally underestimated the volume of record-keeping involved: PCFRA documentation, consent records, the central PEEP register, training records, and correspondence with the Fire and Rescue Service. Property managers who treated this as a document-creation exercise rather than an ongoing records system have needed to revisit their approach within the first few months.
Older Buildings and Physical Provisions
Gap analyses carried out ahead of and since commencement have repeatedly surfaced the same issue in older residential stock: a shortage of Visual Alarm Devices, insufficient refuge provision, and evacuation equipment that either doesn’t exist or isn’t positioned close enough to relevant residents’ flats. Retrofitting these is typically the slowest and most expensive part of achieving a credible compliance position, and Responsible Persons who identified this gap only after commencement have generally found themselves behind where they needed to be.
Escalation Routes Are Still Being Tested
Where a resident disagrees with a Responsible Person’s assessment or feels their needs haven’t been adequately addressed, the route is to raise it with the building’s Accountable Person and, if unresolved, escalate to the Building Safety Regulator. Fire and Rescue Authorities are not expected to arbitrate individual disagreements between residents and Responsible Persons. This distinction between enforcement (FRA) and dispute resolution (Building Safety Regulator) is one that both residents and some Responsible Persons are still becoming familiar with.
What This Means for Responsible Persons Now
For buildings that have not yet reached a confident compliance position, the priority areas reported most consistently since April are:
- Repeat the identification exercise rather than treating an early-2026 survey as complete — build annual re-engagement into a fixed schedule.
- Review consent and representative documentation against the Trusted Person guidance to ensure it’s current.
- Separate the PEEP record system from a one-off document store — the register, consent forms, training records, and FRS correspondence need to function as a living system, not a folder created at launch.
- Commission or revisit a building gap analysis if refuge provision, alarm systems, or evacuation equipment haven’t been properly assessed against relevant residents’ actual needs.
- Make sure staff and residents both understand the escalation route — Accountable Person first, Building Safety Regulator if unresolved — to avoid confusion during an actual dispute.
The Wider Context
It’s also worth being aware that the Regulations themselves remain a point of contested debate. Disability advocacy organisations continue to argue the voluntary, “reasonable endeavours” framework doesn’t go as far as the Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommended. We cover that debate, along with the House of Commons Library’s July 2026 research briefing on the topic, in more detail on our Legal Framework page.
As the Regulations bed in further, expect continued refinement from MHCLG guidance and Building Safety Regulator practice. We’ll keep this page updated as clearer enforcement patterns and further government guidance emerge.
Ready to Review Your Building’s Compliance Position?
Download our free template and start ensuring everyone in your building can evacuate safely. No registration required.
Brand new PEEP templates for individual sectors will be uploaded soon.